VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) – How would you feel about driving over the New Taco Bell Port Mann Bridge if it meant paying less in the way of tolls?
Washington State is so strapped for cash it’s looking at selling the naming rights of roads, bridges, rest stops, and scenic viewpoints to private companies. News1130 is exploring whether the idea would work here.
“It suggests a lack of seriousness,” says Gordon Price, director of the City Program at Simon Fraser University, after laughing out loud. “It suggests you are unable to establish priorities, you’re not prepared to pay for it and you’re not prepared to be adults about it.”
“[Transportation infrastructure] is critical to our economy and our way of life. If we don’t have the ability to actually pay for it, it says something more about our priorities than it does about being a logical way to make money, because it’s not going to make you very much,” he explains.
“It just digs you a little deeper in the hole and then you’re throwing in a bit of sand pretending that it’s not a problem. But it suggests that it really is,” he tells News1130.
“From what I know in Washington and Oregon, they’re not prepared to raise their gas taxes, they’re desperate to find other ways to maintain just what they’ve got, much less build new infrastructure, so they’re getting down to the crumbs,” Price describes.
Corporate names are already splashed across movie theatres, sports arenas, and office towers in Metro Vancouver and Price concedes it does work in some cases.
“It depends on what you’re trying to pay for. Advertising is commonly used, there’s no doubt about that, you see it plastered all over buses and Skytrain and Canada Line stations. The amount of money made is significant but I think there’s something different when you name a public asset with a private brand,” he adds.
“I suspect that’s one of the reasons it’s not called the Telus Gardens stadium and it’s still BC Place. It really says something about the culture, the people and the priorities,” Price says.
Translink’s 2013 base plan shows the transportation authority’s funding gap will be $472-million from 2013 to 2015.
Home Improvement Profiles
News1130 Apps
Tell us what you think!
News1130 Business Profile
Great idea. Why don’t we start with selling the naming rights to the building that houses the Supreme Court. Duh!
Bow down to your new corporate masters.
Anyone notice that the Emergency Cnetre at St. Paul’s has already been renamed for Teck Resources, which donated $2.5 million to the project?
http://www.helpstpauls.com/2012/05/teck-emergency-centre/
As a taxpayer who has been bled dry by governments of all strips, I am in complete support to the notion of naming rights for public facilities, roads, parks, etc.
To those that oppose this on some esoteric notion that our dignity or our freedom will somehow be lost by doing this – your arguments sound great…for a Philosophy class…but in the real world, they don’t cut it.
If deals can be made to offer naming rights which, in turn, reduces or even eliminates the need to steal more money from the public, then it should be done.
“[Transportation infrastructure] is critical to our economy and our way of life. If THE GOVERNMENT doesn’t have the ability to actually pay for it, it says something more about THEIR priorities”
Brand-naming stuff takes away from the dignity of public property. As well, you can’t gaurantee that people are going to be okay with the brands you write contracts with.